Category: Artificial Intelligence
-
Invited to World Economic Forum (WEF) 2026
I am honored to have been invited to the World Economic Forum, which will be held from January 19 to 23, 2026, in Davos. I will take part in a roundtable discussion organized by Robert Mahari, director of the CodeX Center at Stanford, under the auspices of Leading Beyond Boundaries 2026, a forum that describes
-
AI Governance in the banking sector
I am very pleased to have been invited by Academy&Finance to share my expertise during a half-day event dedicated to the challenges posed by AI governance in the banking sector. I will discuss a number of practical approaches to implementing European regulations on AI, particularly through the requirements set out in the ISO 42001 standard.
-
Inventor and AI: interview by Legalcommunity.ch
Many thanks to Legalcommunity.ch for interviewing me (p. 31) about the ruling handed down on June 26, 2025 by the Federal Administrative Court in the DABUS case, in which the Federal Administrative Court ruled that an AI system could not be designated as an inventor, and on which I have already had the opportunity to
-
Artificial Intelligence Governance Practitioner (AIGP) Certification
I am very pleased to have recently obtained my AIGP certification from the IAPP. This certification is based on a solid program offering a comprehensive overview of the challenges involved in implementing an AI systems management program: governance in general (setting up a team, choosing a structure, criteria to consider), design and development (including training
-
AI and copyrights: Anthropic historic settlement
On September 5, 2025, Anthropic requested U.S. District Judge William Alsup to approve a USD 1.5 billion settlement entered into with the plaintiffs to put an end to the class-action lawsuit from a group of authors who accused the artificial intelligence company of using their books to train its AI chatbot Claude without permission. Background
-
LLM Training and copyrights: the Anthropic case – interview on FORUM Broadcasting
We had the opportunity to express our views on the decision handed down on June 23, 2025, by the US District Court for the Northern District of California in the Anthropic case, in which the federal judge ruled that the reproduction of legitimately acquired works for the purpose of training the Claude model constituted a
-
Training an LLM as fair use: the Anthropic case
On 23 June 2025 the US District Court for the Northen District of California ruled in the Anthropic case that training an LLM amounted to fair use. We had already reported on Thomson Reuters, where the District Court of the State of Delaware had ruled that the reproduction of copyrighted materials to train an AI
-
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence : Part 3 -Generative AI Training
I. Introduction: US Copyright Office “pre-publication” of Part 3 In May 2025, the US Copyright Office released a “pre-publication version” of the third part of its overall report related to copyright and artificial intelligence. This rather unusual reference to a “pre-publication version” may be seen (or not…) as a sign of an anticipated dissatisfaction from
-
Copyrights and artificial intelligence: referral to the ECJ on large language models| Intellectual property lawyer
The emergence of large-scale language models (LLMs) is accompanied by a number of legal uncertainties, particularly with regard to copyright. These systems, which are based on the massive analysis of online content, raise the question of the legality of training and partial reproduction of protected content. As a Swiss lawyer specializing in intellectual property, digital
-
Patentability of Artificial Intelligence systems : clarification from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
The patentability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is attracting growing interest in Switzerland and internationally. For innovative companies, it is crucial to understand the limitations imposed by foreign courts, particularly in the United States. In this article, Philippe Gilliéron, a Swiss lawyer based in Geneva specializing in intellectual property and technology, analyzes an important decision